Old trees: large and small: response
Lindenmayer, David B., Laurance, William F., and Franklin, Jerry F. (2013) Old trees: large and small: response. Science, 339 (6122). p. 905.
![[img]](https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF (Published Version)
- Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only |
View at Publisher Website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.339.61...
2
5
Abstract
[Extract] Cecile et al. take issue with our recent Perspective on the rapid global decline of large old trees by asserting that "large" and "old" are not synonymous. Of course, some ancient trees are indeed short in stature [e.g., (1)]. Nonetheless, many of the world's largest trees are also old (more than 500 to 1000 years) (2, 3), so it is correct to highlight this reality.
| Item ID: | 29746 |
|---|---|
| Item Type: | Article (Commentary) |
| ISSN: | 1095-9203 |
| Additional Information: | Response to: Cecile et al. (2013) Old trees: large and small. Science, 339 (6122). p. 904-905. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.339.6122.904-c |
| Date Deposited: | 22 Oct 2013 02:26 |
| FoR Codes: | 05 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES > 0502 Environmental Science and Management > 050202 Conservation and Biodiversity @ 100% |
| SEO Codes: | 96 ENVIRONMENT > 9608 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity > 960899 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity of Environments not elsewhere classified @ 100% |
| Downloads: |
Total: 5 |
| More Statistics |
Actions (Repository Staff Only)
 |
Item Control Page |