A case for mandatory reporting [comment on "The application of assessment of cumulative impacts in cultural heritage management: a critique' by Luke Godwin]
Rowland, Michael J. (2011) A case for mandatory reporting [comment on "The application of assessment of cumulative impacts in cultural heritage management: a critique' by Luke Godwin]. Australian Archaeology, 73. pp. 93-94.
PDF (Published Version)
- Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only |
Abstract
[Extract] Luke Godwin has covered a board compass in this short piece and I only respond to issues that are most relevant to my own experiences.
I concur that the application of formulaic methodologies like ACI to CHM could be difficult for the reasons Luke suggests – i.e. identifying the extent and reliability of the datum, determining an acceptable threshold and determining when those thresholds have been exceeded. I admit, however, that prior to reading Godwin's paper I was not aware of the extent of ACI per se and of pressures to apply it to cultural heritage management issues.
Item ID: | 19678 |
---|---|
Item Type: | Article (Commentary) |
ISSN: | 0312-2417 |
Date Deposited: | 21 Feb 2012 06:59 |
FoR Codes: | 21 HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY > 2101 Archaeology > 210101 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Archaeology @ 100% |
SEO Codes: | 95 CULTURAL UNDERSTANDING > 9503 Heritage > 950302 Conserving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage @ 100% |
Downloads: |
Total: 3 |
More Statistics |