Sustainability planning: pushing against institutional barriers

Goudie, D. (2005) Sustainability planning: pushing against institutional barriers. In: Tiezzi, E., Brebbia, C.A., Jorgensen, S.E., and Almorza Gomar, D., (eds.) Ecosystems and Sustainable Development V. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 5 (81). WIT Press, Southhampton, UK, pp. 215-224.

[img]
Preview
Image (JPEG) (Cover Image)
Download (1MB)
[img] PDF (Published Version)
Restricted to Repository staff only

View at Publisher Website: http://www.witpress.com/978-1-84564-013-...
 
74


Abstract

This paper describes a case study of an institution promoting sustainability goals but acting to restrict innovation and implementation of those same goals.

The issue is important because institutions have cultures which may feel antipathy to a paradigm shift toward sustainability, whilst required to usher in sustainability. There are a multitude of conservative forces representing the Dominant Social Paradigm restricting innovation, despite sustainability policy.

People engaging in sustainability implementation may come into conflict with institutional representatives of the old paradigm.

Resistance to the New Environmental Paradigm may permeate our own organisations. Trying to strike a balance between implementing ecologically sustainable development and respecting institutions’ behaviour may require courage and perseverance.

Institutions are often big, powerful, conservative and may tolerate bullying behaviour if threatened by innovation. With most development takes place in urban settings, concepts of urban sustainability attempt to merge two very different fields of human endeavour - how we modify our landscape, our built environment, and how we behave in that environment. Transport planning in Queensland, Australia displayed a tension between the infrastructure providers and the intending behaviour changers, so that project managers vested with encouraging travel behaviour change, badged as 'TravelSmart', appeared to fear innovation, fear action research which was, definitively, not under their full control.

This paper explores this apparent 'internal dissonance' between the accepted need for, yet fear of change, via a case study attempting to introduce a pilot TravelSmart Destinations project to a provincial Queensland University, and the ways perseverance and maintaining focus on goals in both infrastructure and behaviour will make sustainability gains.

Item ID: 14418
Item Type: Book Chapter (Research - B1)
ISBN: 978-1-84564-013-2
Keywords: institutional barriers; sustainability planning; urban travel
Date Deposited: 01 Dec 2010 00:06
FoR Codes: 16 STUDIES IN HUMAN SOCIETY > 1604 Human Geography > 160499 Human Geography not elsewhere classified @ 100%
SEO Codes: 94 LAW, POLITICS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES > 9402 Government and Politics > 940299 Government and Politics not elsewhere classified @ 100%
Downloads: Total: 74
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page