Sex & immorality: the court's take
Galloway, Kate (2012) Sex & immorality: the court's take. Curl: Property law, women and law, contemporary legal issues, 29 January 2012.
PDF (Scholarly blog post)
- Published Version
[Extract] Early this year, the Supreme Court of New South Wales handed down its decision in Ashton v Pratt. This was an action by Ms Ashton to enforce a promise made by Richard Pratt - director of Visy Industries and well known philanthropist. The Court accepted (though somewhat reluctantly it seems) that Mr Pratt had told Ms Ashton that he would establish trusts of $2.5 million for each of her two children, pay her an allowance of $500,000 per year, pay up to $36,000 per annum for rental accommodation for her, and pay $30,000 per annum for her business expenses, particularly travel. [para 28].
|Item Type:||Article (Commentary)|
|Keywords:||contract, feminism, immorality, law, meretricious, public/private, women|
Curl: Property law, women and law, contemporary legal issues is the blog of Kate Galloway and is available at http://katgallow.blogspot.com.au/ (12 September 2012)
|Date Deposited:||12 Sep 2012 05:14|
|FoR Codes:||18 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES > 1801 Law > 180105 Commercial and Contract Law @ 100%|
|SEO Codes:||94 LAW, POLITICS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES > 9499 Other Law, Politics and Community Services > 949999 Law, Politics and Community Services not elsewhere classified @ 100%|
Last 12 Months: 26