Better SAFE than sorry
Bradshaw, Corey J.A., Clements, Gopalasamy Reuben, Laurance, William F., and Brook, Barry W. (2011) Better SAFE than sorry. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9 (9). pp. 487-488.
PDF (Published Version)
- Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
[Extract] We welcome the debate that our proposed species' ability to forestall extinction (SAFE) index (Front Ecol Environ 2011; 9: 521–525, this issue) has attracted from our peers (see previous letters by Akçakaya et al., Beissinger et al., and McCarthy et al.), because it has further emphasized the need for a more heuristic measure of species extinction threat. The main points of contention can be summarized as follows: (1) SAFE merely echoes the existing IUCN Red List categorization and is therefore redundant; (2) SAFE should not be proffered as a replacement for the Red List; (3) SAFE simplifies mathematically to a measure of a species' abundance and therefore provides no additional risk information; and (4) minimum viable population (MVP) size, on which SAFE is based, is species-specific and so a threshold abundance applied to all species cannot be used. We outline below why each of these arguments is unsupported.
|Item Type:||Article (Refereed Research - C1)|
|Date Deposited:||29 Feb 2012 23:09|
|FoR Codes:||05 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES > 0502 Environmental Science and Management > 050202 Conservation and Biodiversity @ 100%|
|SEO Codes:||96 ENVIRONMENT > 9608 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity > 960899 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity of Environments not elsewhere classified @ 100%|
|Citation Count from Web of Science||