Psychometric properties of the caregiver assessment of movement participation scale for screening children with development coordination disorders
Tsang, Kwan Lan, Bond, Trevor, and Lo, Sing Kai (2010) Psychometric properties of the caregiver assessment of movement participation scale for screening children with development coordination disorders. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 57 (4). pp. 383-402.
PDF (Published Version)
- Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Using Rasch analysis, the psychometric properties of a newly developed 35-item parent-proxy instrument, the Caregiver Assessment of Movement Participation (CAMP), designed to measure movement participation problems in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder, were examined. The CAMP was administered to 465 school children aged 5-10 years. Thirty of the 35 items were retained as they had acceptable infit and outfit statistics. Item separation (7.48) and child separation (3.16) were good; moreover, the CAMP had excellent reliability (Reliability Index for item = 0.98; Person = 0.91). Principal components analysis of item residuals confirmed the unidimensionality of the instrument. Based on category probability statistics, the original five-point scale was collapsed into a four-point scale. The item threshold calibration of the CAMP with the Movement Assessment Battery for Children Test was computed. The results indicated that a CAMP total score of 75 is the optimal cut-off point for identifying children at risk of movement problems.
|Item Type:||Article (Refereed Research - C1)|
|Keywords:||assessment; developmental coordination disorder; home contexts; movement coordination; parent-proxy; participation; Rasch analysis; rating scale; screening instrument; test construction|
|Date Deposited:||30 May 2011 03:23|
|FoR Codes:||11 MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES > 1103 Clinical Sciences > 110321 Rehabilitation and Therapy (excl Physiotherapy) @ 100%|
|SEO Codes:||92 HEALTH > 9299 Other Health > 929999 Health not elsewhere classified @ 100%|
|Citation Count from Web of Science||