The king versus Aleck Bourne: the case that established the lawfulness of terminating pregnancy to preserve women’s health
de Costa, Caroline M. (2009) The king versus Aleck Bourne: the case that established the lawfulness of terminating pregnancy to preserve women’s health. Medical Journal of Australia, 191 (4). pp. 230-231.
Restricted to Repository staff only
Europe, July 1938: Hitler and his Nuremberg rallies are gaining strength; invasion of Czechoslovakia seems imminent; German concentration camps are under construction; and Chamberlain is seeking appeasement. Meanwhile, in London, the Old Bailey criminal court is staging an unusual trial. In the dock of the austere Edwardian building stands Mr Aleck Bourne, FRCS, FRCOG, Consultant Gynaecologist to London’s St Mary’s Hospital, charged under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 with unlawfully using an instrument to procure an abortion.
|Item Type:||Article (Refereed Research - C1)|
This publication does not have an abstract. The first paragraphs of the publication is displayed as the abstract.
|Date Deposited:||27 May 2010 04:29|
|FoR Codes:||11 MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES > 1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine > 111499 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine not elsewhere classified @ 100%|
|SEO Codes:||92 HEALTH > 9299 Other Health > 929999 Health not elsewhere classified @ 100%|
|Citation Count from Web of Science||